Hon. Senior United States District Court Judge Maurice Paul Entered An April 30, 2013 Order Ruling Chief Bankruptcy Judge's Report & Recommendation Was NOT AN APPEAL and Ordering I Had Until May 28, 2013 To File Objections, Which I Did

Here is Hon. Senior United States District Court Judge Maurice Paul's April 30, 2013 Order ruling the Chief Bankruptcy Judge's Report and Recommendation to Withdraw Reference is NOT AN APPEAL and ordering / authorizing me to file Objections to the Chief Bankruptcy Judge's Report and Recommendation by May 28, 2013, which I did:

"IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DAYID F. PETRANO ,
MARY KATHERINE DAY-PETRANO ,

Plaintiffs ,

v. CASE NO. 1:13-cv-00079-MP-GRJ

TREVOR RHODES , et al.,

Defendants.



ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Bankruptcy Judge's Report and Recommendation to withdraw the reference as to this adversary proceeding and transfer to the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Gainesville Division. (Doc. 23). The Clerk incorrectly construed this matter as an appeal from a final order of the Bankruptcy Court and filed a briefing scheduling order. In fact, this matter is before the Court on the Bankruptcy Judge's Report and Recommendation to withdraw the reference as to this adversary proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S .C. § 157(d).

Once the parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and

have been afforded an opportunity to file objections , the Court will consider the matter.

Accordingly , it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The bankruptcy scheduling order (doc. 5) is VACATED.


2. The parties may file objections to the Bankruptcy Judge's Report and Recommendation on or before May 28, 2013.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of April , 2013

s/ Maurice M Paul
Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1: 12-cv-00009-MP-GRJ"

Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait, Florida lawyers, FAILED TO GIVE THIS E-MAIL TO MAGISTRATE JONES AND THEREBY FURTHERED THE FRAUD AND FAILED TO INFORM MAGISTRATE JONES OUR LAWYER TOLD US "payment had been made" that procured the OUTCOME OF VESSEL MISTRESS CASE WITH DISTRICT JUDGE JAMES WHITTEMORE

When The Florida Bar let Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait LIE to Magistrate Jones by saying our Vessel Mistress case was "frivolous" and "vexatious" without disclosing to Magistrate Jones that David and I were the VICTIMS OF THE OPPOSING SIDE'S WITNESS PERJURY, Rhodes and Schwait FAILED TO GIVE THIS E-MAIL TO MAGISTRATE JONES AND THEREBY FURTHERED THE FRAUD AND FAILED TO INFORM MAGISTRATE JONES OUR LAWYER TOLD US "a payment had been made" that procured the OUTCOME OF VESSEL MISTRESS CASE WITH DISTRICT JUDGE JAMES WHITTEMORE: 

"Thanks for the email letter today.

Ihave not heard anything from Jake Munch, and Ido not know whether he is in his office today . We are very slow today with phone contact from attorneys and we have not heard from one insurance adjuster the entire day . Even few clients have called today. It appears everyone is winding down for
Thi:!nksgiving . Ialso know that Mr. Munch routinely closes his office on
Fridays, so it would not be that much of a stretch to close early for the week.

I like the demand letter for insurance . You may be correct about the custodia legis expenses. I see and perform work on quite a lot of maritime insurance claims. If Schryver has not notified whatever insurance he may have had about this claim, they likely will deny it. Iam fighting a couple of these types of insurance-denial claims right now on different facts. But also, marine insurers usually tell me they are under no legal obligation to provide insurance information to me. They may be correct. Iam uncertain an insured has such an obligation, but most times Iconvince them to do so in order that they not prejudice their own coverage, and i n order to avoid me suing them to obtain just the coverage information.

You guys are probably better qualified to do the appeal of the denial of the Motion To Amend. By Judge Whittemore's latest ruling it appears he is saying "I already denied this Motion way back, and I am not going to revisit it". If tha is the case I do not know how the 11th Circuit doesn't remand it to allow leave to amend. This would have to constitute denial of access to the Court. Ido not know what the trial court would have you do at the point you were denied leave to amend (except to state the amount of your claim). Are they suggesting you should have filed another separate lawsuit against the in personam defendants? (which quite obviously would be a waste of money and
resources because we know the situation arose out of the same facts and
transactions, and the cases would have been consolidated anyway.}

I understand the court was a bit frustrated with the number of pleadings in the file and docket, but Ibelieve the court would be hardpressed to say the Plaintiffs had abused their rights to amend their complaint. There may be some confusion about limiting the number of pleadings overall versus limiting the Plaintiffs' right to amend their complaint {especially to name defendants which may or may not be in the case)

I would say you guys go forward with the appeal but I definltely want to stay involved and apprised in the premises of the salvage case. You guys have
more experience doing the appeals than I, especially as it relates to the 11th
Circuit . (Although we did just win reversal of a summary judgment in state
court on a minor case)(And, Ihave won some and lost some in appeals in
general)

It is ridiculous that you guys should have to suffer the prejudice of this witness' perjury (and realistically don't we know why he perjured himself?) (answer : payment had been made). It is unfair that the judge(s) limited your ability to amend the complaint .

Ihad told Jake that if the Court denied the Motion For leave To Amend that the same would be appealed, and at some point, Schryver is going to have to begin paying someone to do his appeal work. Ialso say again that getting tha fraud case going against Hutto in the trial court will put pressure on Schryver (you know he had to have paid Hutto)

fdb

http://us.f525.rnail.yahoo/ .com/ym/ShowLetter?Msgld=4059 __21089727_.1352416_2095_7... 3/26/2007"

Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait, Florida lawyers, FAILED TO GIVE THIS E-MAIL TO MAGISTRATE JONES AND THEREBY FURTHERED THE FRAUD AND FAILED TO INFORM MAGISTRATE JONES OUR LAWYER TOLD US DISTRICT JUDGE JAMES WHITTEMORE HAD VIOLATED OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

When The Florida Bar let Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait LIE to Magistrate Jones by saying our Vessel Mistress case was "frivolous" and "vexatious" without disclosing to Magistrate Jones that David and I were the VICTIMS OF THE OPPOSING SIDE'S WITNESS PERJURY, Rhodes and Schwait FAILED TO GIVE THIS E-MAIL TO MAGISTRATE JONES AND THEREBY FURTHERED THE FRAUD AND FAILED TO INFORM MAGISTRATE JONES OUR LAWYER TOLD US DISTRICT JUDGE JAMES WHITTEMORE HAD VIOLATED OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS:

"we received the Order on the Motion For Reconsideration on the Order Denying Leave to Amend Complaint.
am forwarding this to you separately.

This is completely confounding . The Court denied the Motion, not on the basis of any statute of limitations but on the fact that Motion For Leave to Amend had already been argued and denied . I remember looking back in the file and seeing that the Court had prohibited you filing anything without permission from the Court (which appears to have lead to some of the multiplication of this case), and granted leave to amend the Complaint but only as to the amount of the claim . I do not understand the basis for that limitation .

I do not understand constitutionally how leave to amend could be denied at that time , nor in keeping with the general civil procedure rules and caselaw in favor of liberally granting amendment to complaints . I certainly see the Court was not happy, apparently. with the number of filings in the case, but this should not have meant that you could not file an amended pleading.

Be this as it may, we can not lament over the reasonings and unfairness. doing so will not bring any relief. We are where we are today, the point is what to do about it from this time forward. (i.e., what is the plan of action from this point onward)

It certainly seems to me that the salvage action needs to be appealed . I am unclear, a bit, on where the in rem appeal stands today. If I understand correctly the USCA dismissed some or all(??) of the Hutto case . As I mentioned , one way to proceed on Hutto is to go after him for fraud and try to frame it in the maritime context so that the court has jurisdiction (Art II. sec 3 of the Constitution). You certainly have damages there because of his fraud .

I would have to do some preliminary research on whether the Court's ruling today is appealable right now .
would believe that it is. but the 11th Circuit does dismiss what they deem to be interlocutory appeals .

we also have the settlement demand out to Schryver right now and he may want to settle the case. (See my email to you discussing settlement paramenters and issues) . As I said however . there is no way he settles the case without all of the case being resolved.

Please let me know what your thoughts are on proceeding forward with this case.

fdb

Frank D. Butler, Esq.
10550 U.S 19 North
Pinellas Park, FL 33782

PINELLAS
727-399-2222
727-399-2202 Fax

HILLSBOROUGH
813-899-2222
813-899-2202 Fax

888-BOATLAW"

Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait, Florida lawyers, FAILED TO GIVE THIS E-MAIL TO MAGISTRATE JONES AND THEREBY FURTHERED THE FRAUD

When The Florida Bar let Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait LIE to Magistrate Jones by saying our Vessel Mistress case was "frivolous" and "vexatious" without disclosing to Magistrate Jones that David and I were the VICTIMS OF THE OPPOSING SIDE'S WITNESS PERJURY, Rhodes and Schwait FAILED TO GIVE THIS E-MAIL TO MAGISTRATE JONES AND THEREBY FURTHERED THE FRAUD:

"From: "fdblawfirm@aol.com"
To: dpetrano@yahoo.com 
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 9:52 AMSubject: Re: this is not mary, it's David Petrano, RE: Pickles

What do you want to do in this case with regard to Mr. Pickles? I can send a subpoena D/T, maybe. I am uncertain as to what the trial court view is the status of the case. I thought we viewed the status as you guys have had the in rem part of the case up on appeal for some time now, and the in personam denial of the leave to amend is on appeal. Can we even do anything in the trial court level at this point without running the risk of Rule 11?

Also, Mary had replied that pleading a case against Hutto for the fraudulent testimony would be protected--and I do not know conclusively the answer to that question without researching it--but my next question is OK then, why not plead the case against Schryver for suborning the perjury? There certainly must be a cause of action for that. (You have actual damages in the custodial fees assessed against you) Also, this would have been another possibility--would it not--had the trial court allowed you the chance to amend your complaint. And clearly there would be no time-based or abuse-of-amendment arguments to prohibit such an amendment.

I hope Mary understands that I am for you as clients. ...

I should be hearing back from attorney Munch here in the next bit on whether Schryver wants to settle the case. Presently, there is no offer on the table, nor has there been from the Defendants.

fdb

Frank D. Butler, Esq.
10550 U.S. 19 North
Pinellas Park, FL 33782

PINELLAS
727-399-2222
727-399-2202 Fax

HILLSBOROUGH
813-899-2222
813-899-2202 Fax

STATEWIDE
888-BOATLAW"

(emphasis added).

THE FLORIDA BAR LIKES TO BEAT UP ON FRAGILE X RETARDS WITH SEVERE AUTISM - JEFFREY BROWN, A RETARD - AUTISM BIGOT

The TRUTH about The Florida Bar -- communication I just sent, and I am going to being posting on my blog and disseminating to the Autism community what PIGS and a BASTION of Autism discrimination and ABUSERS The Florida Bar is AND I AM NOT GOING TO SHUT UP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:

"Immediately After I Requested To Make A 28 CFR Sec. 35.107 ADA Grievance Over Jeffrey Brown Not Accommodating MY Disabilities, Jeffrey Brown Referred David Petrano To Grievance Committee in Violation Of 42 USC Sec. 12203 - This serves as my Notice Of My Intent To File New Lawsuit Against TFB, Jeffrey Brown, and Grievance Committee, As Well As Initiators of The Bar Complaint Based On Failure To Accommodate My Disabilities By Magistrate Jones,  for Money Damages For Intentional Retaliation Intended to Derail My Bankruptcy, Deprive me of my Caregiver, and Inflict Disability Injury On Me When TFB, Schwait, and Gonzalez Are Creditors in my Bankruptcy."

Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait, two Florida Bar members, OUTRIGHT INTENTIONALLY LIED to Magistrate Gary R. Jones (COMMITTED A FRAUD ON THE COURT), by stating:

1.) All Petrano lawsuits all over Florida are "frivolous" and "vexatious" and pro se, citing to The Vessel Mistress and Altenbernd lawsuits; and
2.) Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait failed to Inform Magistrate Jones of Magistrate Jenkins report and recommendation ruling Vessel Mistress lawsuit was meritorious;
3.) Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait failed to Inform Magistrate Jones that Jacob J. Munch filed a notice of false testimony of Theron Hutto and Hutto admitted to knowingly and willfully committing perjury in open court against David and I, and he knew a person with severe Autism cannot tell when someone is lying when he did it;
4.) Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait failed to Inform Magistrate Jones that David and I were not pro se but had a lawyer, Frank Butler, Esq. in Vessel Mistress case who wrote in his e-mail that it was "ridiculous" the District Judge James D. Whittemore was saddling us with the costs of the witness perjury against us, that Whittemore was unconstitutionally denying us relief on our meritorious complaint and leave to amend, and that the case went against us because "a payment had been made" (YES, WE HAVE THAT IN WRITING FROM FRANK BUTLER, ESQ.); 
5.)Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait failed to Inform Magistrate Jones that we asked Whittemore to appoint me a Guardian Ad Litem in Vessel Mistress case (3 pleadings) because of my severe Autism and Fragile X learning disabilities and he refused to even consider the issue; and 
6.) Trevor Rhodes and Carl Schwait failed to Inform Magistrate Jones that 11th Circuit Judge Charles Wilson entered an Order making the finding my Altenbernd case was "not frivolous."

In the face of this evidence, The Florida Bar REFUSES TO PROSECUTE JACOB MUNCH, TREVOR RHODES, OR CARL SCHWAIT. 

Instead, The Florida Bar attacked David by referring him to have HIS license taken away AS THE VICTIM OF THE PERJURY AND THE PAYMENT THAT "WAS MADE" TO PROCURE THE OUTCOME OF THE VESSEL MISTRESS CASE.  

While attacking David, The Florida Bar's Jeffrey Brown knowingly refused to give David (and I) Title II ADA extra time accommodations so David could meet his caregiving duties to me, and Jeffrey Brown knew this meant I would not be fed my meals on time, and it would trigger seizures, and that people with Autism and epilepsy have an 800 % risk of sudden death in situations such as this where Jeffrey Brown with The Florida Bar's backing, INTENTIONALLY REFUSED THE ADA ACCOMMODATIONS KNOWING IT WOULD INFLICT A HIGH RISK OF DEATH-FROM-SEIZURE ON ME. 

The Florida Bar's public records response shows Jeffrey Brown has NO Title II ADA training at all. 

My letter to The Florida Bar, against these background facts, continued:
  
"Pls. immediately provide me the public records of whether or not Thomas M. Gonzalez and/or Carl Schwait and/or Trevor Rhodes initiated the Bar Complaint against David or have been involved with it in any way that is being referred to a Grievance Committee in 42 USC Sec. 12203 retaliation violation of MY request for accommodations made the same day as the referral. 

I am prepared to immediately file my lawsuit and seek the information compelled through discovery in the event TFB records custodian continues to obstruct the public records request. 

It is clear there was not enough time for Jeffrey Brown to investigate the response to the inquiry letter David responded to that injured my caregiving before referral to the Grievance committee. It is a clear retaliation against ME whom David cares for from his lawyer income, in retaliation for my asking for ADA accommodations in the Bar complaints I filed as well as to provide witness testimony to Davids and to accommodate my caregiving needs. 

I am also going to start posting on my blog about how Jeffrey Brown did this to injure my Autism and he can sue me if he would like, but I am NOT going to take down my posts and I am going to tweet them several times per day to the Autism community. 

This is Autism discrimination and abuse.You are a Horrid organization that is a BASTION of Autism discrimination who refuses to protect adults with severe Autism, and selectively prosecutes Autism family members and furthers and encourages your Bar members to discriminate, retaliate, commit fraud, and abuse severely Autistic adults. 

The Autism community and the entire United States has a First Amendment right to know what your organization stands for - Autism abuse and discrimination. 

Respectfully,
Mary Katherine Day-Petrano"

I personally requested a Title II ADA extra time accommodation from Jeffrey Brown so David could tend my caregiving needs, and Jeffrey Brown responded by WHINING ABOUT THE ADA and referring David to a Florida Bar grievance committee ON THE SAME DAY -- A CLEAR 42 U.S.C. Sec. 12203 ADA retaliation. 

There were over 100 evidence documents Jeffrey Brown NEVER INVESTIGATED that supported David's response, before ANGRILY REACTING TO THE ADA ACCOMMODATIONS REQUEST BY REFERRING HIM TO GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE - how does a Bar investigator read and investigate a 130 pg response and over 100 evidence documents in only 1-2 days ?

He CAN'T. 

Hello Florida Bar, I will SUE YOU AGAIN. I DON'T HAVE TO TAKE YOUR AUTISM ABUSE, AND I HAVE ASSOCIATIONAL STANDING, 28 C.F.R. SEC. 35.130(g). 

COME BEAT UP ON A RETARD AGAIN - THE FLORIDA BAR LIKES TO BEAT UP ON FRAGILE X RETARDS WITH SEVERE AUTISM - JEFFREY BROWN, A RETARD - AUTISM BIGOT.

Dealing w/ autism in the legal system - by my husband, David Petrano

From:

This sender is DomainKeys verified

"david petrano"

Add sender to Contacts

To:

"cschwait@dellgraham.com" , "bog8@flabar.org" , "Mary Day- Petrano"

Mr. Schwait,

is there any program or mechanism to train lawyers and judges to effectively communicate or meaningfully deal with adults on the autism spectrum, so to ensure these people receive due process of law whether in tort, contract or civil rights settings? I am sure you agree this is a critical issue which must be addressed in order to meet TFB's goal of attaining "equal access to and availability of legal services" as mentioned in the letter I received from you this morning.

I have first-hand knowledge of what it is to live with an autistic adult, especially in terms of what it is like to experience an "autism meltdown" when autistics and/or their caretakers attempt to seek remedy and redress in the legal system, and are met with attorneys and judges who have no autism awareness training.

In a USDCNDF case where my autistic wife sought UM coverage to pay for medically diagnosed brain injury my wife suffered in an automobile accident,  US Magistrate Judge Gary Jones made an intitial factual finding my autistic wife was a licensed attorney and even invited me to commit the felony crime of filing pro hac vice motions to enable her to practice law in USDCNDF, with zero factual foundation to support his finding my wife was a lawyer. This single instance which is commonly referred to among the autism community as an "autistic meltdown" resulted in my autistic wife biting her arms, crying and screaming non-stop for 12+ hours, w/ conditions I can only describe as a prolonged uncontrollable seizure.    

In another instance, a licensed FL attorney, Ms. Gina Smith who had first-hand knowledge of my wife's untreated brain injury, autism and propensity to experience severe autism meltdowns, sent Mary and myself a US District Court confer communication regarding Ms. Smith's intent to file a judicial notice motion regarding Florida DHSMV records, which both Mary and I understood as an attempt by Ms. Smith to trigger revocation of our FL drivers licenses based on our respective disabilities. As described above, this confer proffered by Ms. Smith resulted in my autistic wife experiencing another "autistic meltdown" no less severe than described above.  

Such fact patterns as described above can only be avoided when attorneys and judges alike, attain autism awareness, so to enlighten lawyers and judges the orders and legal pleadings they file can have horrible, life threatening effects on persons with autism. 

Given your position w/ TFB, with your stated goal to "attain equal access to and availability of legal services," it is extremely important for you to realize the present autism epidemic has in fact resulted in many autism caretakers to do unthinkable things because they simply cannot help their autism family members to attain due process of law when seeking to attain autism accommodations or medical treatment. 

For example my wife's former caretaker-mother poured gasoline on herself and self-immolated in front of my wife (which according to her suicide note and related letters, she was no longer able help her daughter attain autism disability accommodations with courts and lawyers). 

For over a decade, I have had an extremely difficult time providing caretaking duties to my autistic wife which I am ordered to do by Pinellas County Circuit Judge Jack St Arnold, not because my wife "suffers" from autism" but because she "suffers" from what others with no autism awareness training say and do to her whenever she seeks legal redress in courts.  

I look forward to your prompt reply to ensure my wife and my other disabled clients attain due process of law by lawyers and judges with actual training in autism and disability awareness, because at this present time, anything I do or say on my wife's behalf or any disabled client in a courtroom setting, is alwaysinterpreted as "shotgun pleading," "without merit," "vexatious," "sanctionable" etc., by judges and lawyers who lack autism training and awareness, to the extent my law license to practice law is in jeopardy.  

David F. Petrano, Esq.

Hawthorne Legal Services

11502 SE US Hwy 301

Hawthorne, FL 32640-7720

Phone (727) 808-0446 

My Adult Autism Human Rights Complaint Against the United States I Filed With The United Nations

Mary Katherine Day-Petrano

11502 SE US Hwy 301

Hawthorne, Florida 32640

e-mail: ponyhunterjumper@yahoo.com

Cell (727) 808-0446 (my husband)

___________________________

UNITED NATIONS

Office of United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Human Rights Council Branch-Complaint Procedure Unit 
OHCHR- Palais Wilson
United Nations Office at Geneva 
CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland 
Fax: (41 22) 917 90 11
E-mail: CP@ohchr.org

 October 4, 2012

HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLAINT AGAINST THE UNITED STATES FOR TORTURE AND ATTEMPTING TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS WITH AUTISM, ESPECIALLY ADULTS WITH AUTISM

I have Autism. I don’t know how to state my Complaint like others can. So I am going to say it the only way I can communicate. I have severe Autism and brain injuries. When someone tells another that a person has Autism, it is informing that other person that the Autistic person may have extreme problems communicating our needs.

If I need to provide more details, I am asking for the assignment of someone trained in Autism to help and assist me to state my complaint so I can access the ability to communicate as required by the rules that apply. I can only communicate electronically and in this shade of colors, and I have an extremely difficult time being able to communicate in more than 140 character blocks of text. This is due to my Autism and brain injuries.  

The United States under the current Government and the Governments heretofore existing, have been carrying out a systematic torture and genocide upon the adult Autism population in the United States. This is what numerous state actors have done to me personally:

1.)   They have refused to specifically train ALL government officials in all branches of the United States government and state government in Autism, and especially how it affects adult women with Autism, and as a consequence;

2.)   The government of the United States has left me as a severely Autistic brain injured person with no financial or other means to pay for food, shelter, and medical care I require to sustain my life for over 55 years – I have been left with a broken finger, severely deformed crippled foot, and severe brain injury with NO access to ANY medical care and judicial and executive officers of the United states refuse to assist me to get this access or to help me stay in my home where I am safe from harm;

3.)   The government of the United States has denied and continues to deny me all access to the disability benefits I need to stay in my home, for supports and services to my Autism and brain injuries, continues to dismiss all petitions I try to make for help, refuses to appoint anyone to assist and help me, and has essentially sentenced me to starve and die because I am Autistic.

4.)   When I try to complaint and assert my civil and human rights under the protection of Treaties the United States has already become signatory to and ratified (ICCPR, CAT, Convention against Genocide), various government actors retaliate against me and subsequently many of them become promoted in their careers.

5.)   I have repeatedly asked the United States Attorney General for help enforcing my rights. No one will help me. They do not even seems to understand what Autism is.

6.)   I am not alone – there are approximately 3.5 million adults with Autism in the United States suffering like me.

7.)   My Country caused my vaccine injuries when I was about 15 months of age, and brought me to full-blown Autism. My government has refused to provide any means accessible to adults with Autism to directly be provided with compensation, funding, medical care, and to be able to stay in our homes and live in freedom in response to causing these injuries. I was genetically susceptible to vaccine injuries due to my Jewish ancestry. 

8.)   My Autism and brain injuries are lifelong severe disabilities. I am not stupid, but I also cannot effectively communicate with anyone unless they change the way they are communicating with and providing access to adults with severe Autism and brain injuries throughout the United states and state governments, and most especially the United States Courts where the judicial officers are trained only to carry out severe punishment upon adults with Autism, deny us access, take away all of our needs, try to lock us up for no other reason than being Autistic, and sentence us to death – and I do not know what I ever did wrong to be mistreated this way and subject to torture, cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment, or systematically swept into the genocide the United States is trying to commit upon the Autistic people.

I am aware the various human rights treaties the United States has signed and/or ratified mandate they provide me the funding, health care, governmental and court access, and someone to assist me that I need.

I am asking for a United Nation’s human rights investigation to be opened against the United States, State of Florida, and County of Alachua for violation of my human rights and appoint someone to oversee those violations of millions of other adults with Autism, and if these state actors continue in their violations, then I am asking the United Nations to deny all cooperation and relief to the United states and take sanctions and other measures against them.

Adults with Autism have every right to live in freedom with the supports and services we need to sustain our lives, and not be tortured or otherwise subject to genocide by our Country and state actors within it.

Respectfully submitted,

S/ 

Mary Katherine Day-Petrano